Innovation is the fundamental motivation of economic development. Without innovation, it can only be famous.

Innovation has been proposed for many years, but innovation is very difficult when we really implement it. We are better at adherence to past experience.

However, the development of the times always favored innovators. Because the times are in different time periods, it is manifested as different characteristics and needs, and the experience we have only represents the needs of a specific era or a specific time period, so we can achieve a lot of achievements at that time, but we cannot change it. The times have gone again.

The ancients said that Ye Zhiqiu. That is to say, a whole cause and effect are learned through all the analysis on a point.

I found that in the past long -term work career, many platforms not only did not have innovative consciousness, but also stifled innovative awareness and innovation behavior.

The main reason is that innovation cannot immediately bring visible results in a short period of time. Most of the innovation will be planted at the beginning and will make mistakes. However, our platform rules are not allowed to make mistakes, and mistakes will be punished. This first contains the possibility of innovation. Secondly, innovation needs to pay a lot of costs. For example, when the staff of the platform can only get the results when they are obedient, and your innovation will look complicated, you will not be able to get others in the short term, you will not be able to get others in the short term, and you will not be able to get others in the short term. It will be questioned and denies.

I used to be on a platform. When the professional manager at the time was meeting, when we drained the development plan, he always hated planning tomorrow, just to talk about today. Severe differences. Why does he have such a cognition? It is mainly because his past success is this way, that is, it is enough to grasp the day. As for tomorrow, it will be unknown. Tomorrow will want to plan tomorrow tomorrow, but his habit has indeed achieved in the past. With less achievements, but at the moment, this habit has been outdated.

At the same time, we also have differences in marketing. He believes that marketing can only have one reward point, because if there are two reward points, it will disperse the action of users, which will cause users to do not know how to do it. At that time, I heard this kind of conversation, I am also quite helpless. Since everyone's cognition cannot be reconciled, then we will do their own, depending on who is effective.

Facts are better than arguments. After testing, I found that I was more effective, so I was adopted.

In many cases, innovation is not manifested as a linear relationship, but manifested as a relatively complicated system, so when innovation is manifested as a systematic thing or a systematic thing, he is not What many people are understood by many people, the first feeling of many people is to increase costs? Is this complicated? Can you turn this into a question of 1+1 = 2?

Therefore, when there is a problem in this direction, when the direction is wrong, we will be pulled back from the system aspects from the system, which is the simple cause of causality. So under the direction of this simple cause and effect, any solution we draft is very simple, which is a problem of 1+1 = 2. However, when we go to practice, we find that what we encounter we encounter The problem cannot be solved, or it is difficult to solve.

In my career for so many years, I found that this is a common problem in the workplace. There are more than some of the innovative factors on the workplace, and there are many other factors. I will give everyone a detailed way.

If this workplace focuses on bureaucratic atmosphere, then the person who master the power is the object of everyone to shoot. So in such an atmosphere, the right or wrong is no longer important. What is important is that you can make a fart success, and you can get the promotion of the superior. Under such atmosphere and wind direction, let alone innovation, you don't even have the possibility of improvement. You can only perform 100%unconditionally, a plan or one action specific method.

Once my leader said such a sentence, of course, the probability of the platform at that time was also dominated by bureaucracy. The leader said that regardless of whether the executive is right or wrong, as long as he gave us this, we must fully obey and do it, even if this is completely wrong. If it is confirmed that it is wrong, although it has caused the company's property loss, it has the opportunity to carry a black pot. In this way, it will become the confidant of the high -level and after the confidant of the high -level. now you.

Although I can't agree with this view, I can't refute it, because this is a reality of this style of atmosphere. As a migrant worker, you may carry your great dream, but the platform cannot install your dreams. So, your work becomes a very simple cause and effect, that is, the purpose of your work to make money, in order to make money, you must let go of the so -called right and wrong concepts. You should take more money to make more money. Corresponding obedience measures.

So, the original leader was pretty good, but I resigned early. This means that after a person's ideas have problems, you will definitely do things along your own ideas. Of course, the platform will not go down because someone leaves, after all, the thin camel is bigger than the horse. So a powerful platform, even if he can't achieve great development, the slow development method still exists.

Secondly, innovation may increase costs, because innovation represents a declaration of unknown war and an unknown strategy that has not been verified. In this case, you start or do things in scratch or empty hands. To invest in this cost, in the eyes of the boss, this cost is that this cost is unable to have a successful certainty and it is likely to be transformed into a sinking cost, so he will not simply agree. He will open a lot of meetings to discuss. Not only will he discuss with you, but he will also open a company's democratic meeting. Everyone vote for decision. Therefore, a conclusion that is finally formed in this process is neither the best nor the worst, but a compromised solution.

If a company does not have a strict significance for the rules, even if the corresponding scheme is formed, the corresponding executor will not perform well, and even in the process of execution The purpose of the purpose cannot be achieved. For example, if we go to the farmer, our purpose is to achieve some consensus at the China Merchants Association, but some people sell him a bottle for him to experiment. A bottle of up to 100 yuan is made, but it conveys such a message to the farmer. You have no confidence in your products and you need to verify. Do I need to buy it again in your investment promotion? That's absolutely impossible!

Why does this phenomenon appear? The main reason is that this company has never regarded rules as an important thing. Because even the boss publicly violated the rules he formulated, for example, the price of the boss made this product was two yuan. Later, because of other factors, he was promoted to Sanyuan. However, many things happened in the time period he formulated a two -yuan range, but he did not admit that the boss needed for his own interests. He said that employees needed to make money up. Therefore, it is not surprising that the employees of the entire company violate the rules are not surprising because someone is doing an example.