Once everyone has the ability to innovate. Many people do not like to learn. He is an empiricalist. The knowledge and skills he mastered may stay 10 years ago. Think about it 10 years ago. Knowing that 10 years ago, 10 years ago, the skills of 10 years ago to decide such a solution that needed innovation at present. His so -called innovation must be a copy of the past.
I have a friend. He has been in a business for many years. Not only does he not make money, but he owes a bank debt, so I see him very anxious and want to help him, but when I talk about each time I talk He found his thinking, his cognition, his knowledge and skills stayed 10 years ago, and he was difficult to accept for new things. Later, when he visited him, he recruited a professional manager. This professional manager came out of the state -owned enterprise. What the professional manager talked about it was not the moment at the moment. What do the unit make? How did you do it? I want to copy the period of that period to the present. Think about it, can this be successful? I was very doubtful at the time. A marketing method in the 1990s had to apply until now 2020. How is this possible? Moreover, in 2020, he also faces a new factor such as an epidemic.
Of course, this friend who is doing business, he is also a very diligent person. His working hours every day are more than ten hours, so it is still a common thing to go on the road at two or three in the morning. The internal consumption of his body caused his body to have a lesion. Later, the hospital couldn't cure it. This person no longer exists.
It can be seen that it is not that there is no way to innovate, not to say that the correct innovation path does not exist in this world, but even if he comes to us, we cannot recognize him, so as to reject him in various ways. Remove him.
For example, in the past, when I talked with some bosses with the Internet, when we talked about the user level, I talked about a lot of details. Traffic and traffic thinking. Think about what kind of value does this talk about? Everyone cannot resonate in many details of user operations. Talking about the same level of cognition at the end of the discussion, what is traffic thinking? Is the traffic spend money? Does the traffic need to be operated? Can the traffic continue?
So even if you have a good plan, you must not be implemented, because the stage itself does not have the conditions for implementation. And because all walks of life are relatively internal, many platforms hope to obtain results through innovation, but they often simply want to ask for obtaining instead of dedication, and to push all the risks to each other. Is it wrong from the starting point? Are there such people willing to do a innovative thing with you? Of course there will be no.
Of course, innovation is not a random innovation, but also has a certain level of knowledge, and a certain level of ability and even a certain comprehensive ability to comprehensively have various factors at the moment.
When I went to a agricultural company that year, in fact, I had an idea very early to go to that agricultural company to do things, but after all, I did not go to success. There are many reasons for many aspects.
If a company does not have a precipitation, of course, this precipitation is not just to say that the money earns money, the money made by employees, everyone is very happy. This is an aspect. It not only contains the gradient of this business method, but also the precipitation of its business culture, the precipitation of its user management and operation, and the atmosphere culture of their company's employees. I did n’t actually see it or feel it, because every time I talk, it points to a simple communication. Every time I talk or when I go to observe, their employees are talking about the parents. Talking about business, let alone how to innovate his business. Everyone does not seem to like to understand these things. Think about how to implement innovation under such an environment and basic conditions? Even if you make a innovative thing, you still need this group of employees to approve. What level can they understand? Although you can give you a position, you are equivalent to having certain permissions, but in fact their company's conference is greater than any permissions, then it is equivalent to all decisions that are democratic. Then in this case, the real decision -making power belongs to the least capable person. Because according to the theory of wooden barrels, it depends on the shortest wooden board.
In the end, what I want to say is that if an enterprise wants to break through the inner volume, and wants to adopt an innovative method, it is high -speed. Many aspects of him need to be changed, including his recruitment outlook and employment views that need to be changed. A person with a work experience for 10, 8 years, or longer, this is a talent, but if you want him to innovate, the possibility is not great, because his success comes from experience, not from innovation. Innovation often comes from new employees with innovative ability, rather than experienced old employees or experienced new employees.
There are many platforms like this. Many start -up platforms have even operated a long -term platform. This phenomenon is still very serious, so the seriousness of this phenomenon represents that the enterprise does not adopt the best development method, but instead, but instead, it is Adopting such a development method of relatively hard struggle. Among this development model, experience and abilities have become the most important factor. Of course, there are other relationships such as relationships, back doors, hidden rules, that is another other one. aspect.
It is not difficult to change such a situation, but it is very little to change in reality. I do n’t have a long time to work in Shenzhen, so I do n’t know much about Shenzhen companies, but since Shenzhen is an innovation in innovation In a type of city, then I expected that they must be the correct decision -making person to have the greatest power, because in an innovative -driven organization, it is more biased towards dictatorship, because this innovative plan or the master of this path of innovation The things he proposed will not be recognized by all employees, and will not even be recognized by most employees. They will put forward a variety of objections. They can only see it when they see the leopard in the tube. Go on, grab it. At this time, the key is to look at the characteristics of this company. If the company is unprecedentedly operating, then this solution will definitely be abandoned. If the company has a certain fault tolerance, then this plan may be Go to implement it after modifying.
Of course, for bosses, if you want to obtain a bonus for innovation and development, you also need to have a loss of losses, which means that you want to make a certain project. What is the amount you decided to suffer in this project? Then consider other things. If you don't want to lose a penny on a project that needs innovation to achieve, then this project must not be done.
So what the boss thinks is not to make a profit immediately. What you think is how much loss you can withstand before making. Because of many innovative things, it is precisely because of this necessary loss that it has achieved a brilliant result brought by an innovation.