Chinese farmers have promoted society's progress, and have always been saying that the people have been eaten as the sky. Among the feudal society for more than 2,000 years, agriculture has always been the pillar of socio -economic and economical, which is related to the stability and external security of the country. Therefore, in ancient times, the basic measures for heavy agricultural suppression of business have been implemented.

Since the modern revolution, the original accumulation of capitalism represented by the British Circle Movement has accelerated the rise of capitalism in Western countries. However, the old China still maintains the old system. The land is concentrated in the landlords and bureaucrats. Farmers have always lived a farming life under the natural economic state of planting land.

However, with the invasion of the Western powers, the oppression of Chinese farmers has become more and more oppressed, and the phenomenon of bankruptcy of farmers has become more and more frequent, and the farmers' war represented by the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement broke out.

After the founding of the People's Republic of China, it began to change the small farmers' economy as a collective economic organization model, and implement a series of socialist mutual aid groups, cooperatives, senior cooperatives, and people's communes from low -level to advanced agricultural changes.

In this process, the interests of agricultural interests are basically left to individuals. The agricultural supports the operation of the entire national system. With the development logic of agricultural support and work, the industry of New China has ushered in spring.

However, until the 1980s or even the 1990s, the problem of food and clothing of the people was always a top priority. To this end, after the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee, China began to enter the strategic steering of reform and opening up. Began to grow rapidly.

However, because the distribution mechanism of agricultural interests has not changed, the central and local governments have the authority to take this part of the interests, resulting in some or large parts of farmers who want to realize their families to become rich under the land joint production responsibility system.

However, overall, the problem of food and clothing of farmers is gradually being resolved. However, under the changes in the rapids of the past, if the consumption power of farmers wants to improve, they must obtain other economic resources. When they were leisure, they went out to work to make money, and when they were busy, they went home to plant land.

However, as the actual income of migrant workers gradually grew greater than the benefits of agricultural harvest, people's attitudes towards agriculture have quietly changed.

Taking East China land north as an example, the yellow land is basically two seasons of crops a year, cross -winter wheat and cross -autumn corn. The actual land area of ​​the single households is very different in the actual land area of ​​the family co -production contract. In addition, the grain crop harvesting is limited, the price is stable, and the cost is thrown out. It is still small in income without artificially.

However, the opposite of farmers' agriculture is that the speed of inflation and devaluation of banknotes is far greater than the price increase of grain crops. Unless large -scale operations and more land, it is difficult to get rich.

Behind the scale of large -scale operations is the abandonment of the land by countless farmers. They still belong to the family joint production responsibility system in form, but there is no land operating right, because the operating rights have been circulated. The price is the interest of land use given by the other party. It must be smaller than the actual business interests of farmers, and essentially the corresponding farmers' land income has decreased.

Such cases happened in a place in Qingdao. The foreign people spread the collective land of the village collective land. Later, the business became better and better, but the benefits of land transfer did not rise. It's right. But after grabbing back, they would not run, and eventually lost again. This was the ending of both defeats.

Therefore, even if the agricultural economic mechanism is changed, it is still difficult to achieve a climate by relying on farmers to fight alone. In front of the smart market operators, farmers are still at an absolute disadvantage, which may cause unable to increase their income even in harvest.

At the same time, in the past seven or eight years, many places have carried out rural tourism, rural economy, etc. There are many laughing stocks that paint tigers who do not become anti -dogs. Not only was the collective property of paper villages, but also overdrawing the development potential of the village collective, which turned rich into a negative.

With rural tourism in a country in Shandong and introducing developers, it is known as investing in 800 million and 18 billion yuan. When the construction of rural tourism is basically completed, the interests of the villagers have been taken away by fraud. Even if rural tourism can bring good village benefits, the villagers have not yet squeezed the land resources, but also reduced family joint production. The distribution of land under the contract responsibility system has pushed up local prices. Farmers living in the poverty of the village of the United States are simply a wonderful irony.

Therefore, I think that the development and revitalization of rural areas can basically be difficult to succeed if the farmers' income guarantee issues are not considering. Because developers only fish for exhaustion, just to fulfill their private pockets, and to achieve some kind of interest balance with some corruption elements, how can the people who abandon the general public as a lame, how can the enthusiasm of farmers in the development of development be mobilized?

The original intention of rural rejuvenation and peasant agricultural development is common prosperity, but we must also be alert to generate a new type of landlord class in the process. Not only did they not be rich in the basic social spirit of the wealth, but also to make new types of poverty and deceive national property. Essence Even if the East Window has happened in the future, the relevant personnel will be dealt with, but the interests of the harmful farmers are gone, and it is difficult for their spirit to move again.

Be wary of the risk of social corruption in rural revitalization and agricultural development, we must establish and improve the supervision of grass -roots disciplinary committees, build political representatives on the basic unit, and firmly ensure the healthy development of rural society with the firm spirit of fighting tigers and flies.

Although the autonomy of villagers implemented in China for a long time, with the current localization of rural localized smart productivity, it is still serious. There are still many feudal privileges thinking. The development of rural agriculture urgently requires smart promotion and development.

From this we can conclude that rural rejuvenation and agricultural development, and farmers' income increase is not a simple model problem. This is a problem that needs to be solved urgently.

Therefore, rural reforms must be deepened, policy design is optimized to ensure that farmers can obtain substantial benefits in rural rejuvenation. On the one hand, it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of rural tourism and other projects, prevent waste of resources and benefit transportation, and ensure that farmers can share their due income in the implementation of the project. On the other hand, we must increase technical training and legal education for farmers, improve their market competitiveness, and make them truly the main force of rural revitalization.

Farmers' main position in rural rejuvenation cannot be ignored. The sense of participation and gain of farmers is the foundation of rural revitalization. This requires us to fully respect and protect the rights and interests of farmers in the process of policy formulation and implementation. By constructing a fair and reasonable interest distribution mechanism, farmers enable farmers to enjoy more results in rural tourism and other industries. At the same time, strengthen the technical training and rule of law of farmers, improve their comprehensive quality, and inject persistent driving force into rural revitalization. In practice, we should pay attention to stimulating farmers' creativity and enthusiasm, guide them to participate in decision -making, give play to the spirit of the owner, and jointly build a beautiful countryside. In this way, we can ensure the smooth implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, promote the comprehensive development of agriculture, rural and farmers, and move towards the goal of common prosperity.

On this basis, we must give full play to the core role of party organizations in rural revitalization, and ensure that the party's work is always close to rural reality and close to the needs of farmers. Strengthening the leading role of party building in rural rejuvenation is specifically reflected in deepening the construction of party style and clean government, strengthening intra -party supervision, improving the quality of party members, ensuring that each link can be fair and transparent, effectively play the role of party members' vanguard, promote the strategy of rural revitalization strategy In -depth implementation.