Most recent publications
The public generally condemns the "snatching women" to use their youth to "take" the boss, but ignores the boss's lust. (A 24-year-old "snatching girl" made a fortune for nothing, and successfully "captured" her boss. In just three years, she squandered her boss's savings and even kept seven young men. Since then, the woman was pushed to the forefront of public opinion by the media, and most people accused her of being immoral.) In order to maintain social stability, the state always allows public opinion to resist various immoral behaviors. However, since ancient times, there has been a saying of "unlucky businessman". Has the boss never got rich through any improper means? Similarly, the "raise girl" also achieved the purpose of getting rich through improper means. Why do we only condemn the immoral behavior of the "little fairy" instead of reflecting on the boss's moral shortcomings? Is that boss really a total honest person? If he hadn't been greedy for the beauty of the "little fairy", how could he have suffered such heavy losses? 
