The words that have been lingering in my ears in the past two years are that it is difficult to find a job. Isn’t there really not many jobs in the entire society? This discourages those who are looking for a job, spread rumors and hearsay, making it difficult to find a job as a tiger.

So I decided to investigate the authenticity of this matter. Why do so many people say that it is difficult to find a job? What is the reason behind this?

We don’t need to emphasize the objective reasons anymore. This is familiar, including the crackdown on the epidemic, the tightening of policies, the prudence of the consumer market, etc.

But are these macro-level things really directly related to poor work? In fact, this is simply a misunderstanding. You have to know that when you are looking for a job, society only needs to meet you as a person and one position. Are all the vacant positions not suitable for you?

This answer is obviously no. In fact, basic positions, service positions, etc. all require a large number of personnel. Although many people have joined the job, they are arrogant and will not be able to leave for a long time and then resign and resign with those who are not yet employed. .

Society may not be able to meet everyone's work needs, but society can definitely meet someone's needs, but this person needs to be able to adapt to the job environment.

Yesterday I tried to apply for a service position, and I found that there are still quite a lot of service positions, and they urgently need staff to take up their posts. As long as you promise to start work immediately, you will definitely get a job again immediately. This is strange, why can't it be saturated?

So I joined a basic position and learned almost all the truth on the first day. It turns out that there will always be unstable factors within any workplace. They either complain about the bad working environment, complain about the hard work, or find various other reasons, and then they will change jobs.

There are many such people in the service industry, especially the younger generation. If the company then blocks people with the so-called entry age or other conditions, the losses caused by the company will be irreparable. In this case, only by more rationally seeking people from the market can the company operate smoother.

I've only been there for a day. I just went to work in the morning and heard someone start to state the company's phenomenon. Who said that he would quit immediately as long as he changed his job, who ran away after only a few days of working in a certain position, who hadn't waited for the company to find it yet. I said, I stopped going to work the next day after I stopped working.

If you are not in the workplace, you will never be able to understand these high-frequency sounds in the workplace. You can only observe from the outside, and then you will never be able to know what the truth is.

When I got off work, the supervisor said that I had received the so-called work clothes for me, but it was not new clothes, but was thrown down by the person who changed jobs. As soon as I picked it up, I smelled a pungent sour smell. This has to be said that the company itself also has certain problems. It is a bit stingy to treat new employees. At least the clothes should be completely new, right?

However, I don’t care about these things, maybe this is the norm for enterprises today. When I heard these voices within the company, I am not surprised why they no longer say that they should not say that they should not be above 35, not less than university diploma, and not less than three years of work experience. Their platform personnel flow too quickly , if you set limits on yourself, the consequences will be unimaginable.

Then, I experienced the difficulty of this job. I found that the work itself was not difficult, especially for these grassroots positions, the skills required were basically available in less than half a day.

Most of the work does not require your innovation, as long as you practice makes perfect. Because the work is low and easy to get started, this means that the job is relatively substitutable.

It is precisely because of the strong substitutability and rapid personnel flow, as long as basic personnel supply is ensured, accelerated personnel flow has become normalized.

Now many companies also realize that age should not be a factor in setting limits, and they have gradually realized that people with sense of responsibility and ability are the talents they urgently need.

Those private enterprises that are still very cautious in their age factor and follow public enterprises basically don’t live a very satisfactory life. Because the labor cost they did not reduce, but was getting higher and higher, but the productivity results they expected were still far away.

Of course, compared with such companies, more companies have realized this problem. They are allowing the power of promoting the company to gradually integrate with a more open attitude and a more inclusive spirit.

I think that private enterprises are in line with state-owned enterprises, which is a way out. First of all, many state-owned enterprises, including institutions, can get more funding advantages from the country, and some even make financial appropriations. But for private enterprises, there is nothing to enjoy the cool under the tree. Private enterprises must be more inclusive to find their own way.

Inclusiveness, innovation, etc. of private enterprises may lead to a faster turnover of people in the entire market, but in a sense, this phenomenon can make employment an easy thing, and in practice it, it should be true. The style.

Nowadays, many private enterprises still maintain the development mentality of 20 years ago. They think they can always be arrogant and still take an indifferent attitude towards talents, or talk to others about the so-called co-founders. In fact, the other party even has the power to do so. No, they packed the words like this or that to deceive the other party’s pocket of cash.

I have also been to several Internet companies. They are keen on their business model and think it is an invincible model in the world. They don’t like to hire employees because the cost of hiring employees is too high, so they give them a more renowned name. , that is, the co-founder or partner, but in fact, the other party’s basic rights and interests cannot be guaranteed. To put it clearly, they are just a group of anglers who go fishing but are reluctant to even bait. Their object of worship is Jiang Ziya fishing volunteers taking the bait, but they do not have such a good mentality. What they hope is whether they are volunteers or Those who don't want to, they should all take the bait.

I used to write a story about a certain beauty company. They worked on OEMs and then recruited a large number of people in the form of recruitment. The company has a cooperative relationship with them. The company can provide such a place for everyone. They just need to work hard. You can live with commissions, but what the company wants to achieve is to make money by lying down.

This phenomenon is common in many metaphysical companies. They can lose a lot of money in the business field, but they are never willing to pay for truly talented people. They believe that the wool comes from the sheep, and as long as they give the other party a high amount of money to raise. Achievement is OK.

However, they look for those who are looking for jobs in the name of recruitment, hoping to continue to absorb their surplus value. In fact, the company likes to share risks with these people, but is unwilling to share the fruits of victory with them.

This business model of selling risks to others first is like a company recruiting a group of free salesmen, who can get profits in the business model, while the company can always live with excess profits. So, in a normal sense, these companies are not short of employees, but just creating anxiety and panic.