Some scenic spots, especially those with political significance, are open to the public for free all year round. However, this free access requires visitors to scan a QR code to register and make a reservation, and then check in using the QR code. Generally, group reservation codes need to be made a day in advance, while individual reservations are not subject to this restriction; as long as it is a day when the scenic spot is open, visitors can register on-site and enter immediately.

However, with the arrival of summer vacation, the flow of people is gradually increasing. If the previous method is still used, it will put a significant strain on manpower. Therefore, after research, the scenic spot has decided that starting tomorrow, no registration will be required for everyone; they can simply pass through the security check.

This process is similar to entering the subway, where luggage and other items go through the security check, and people also pass through a security channel. Unlike the subway, after passing through the security check, one needs to buy a ticket or swipe a card to enter the subway. For free scenic spots, however, as long as one passes through the security check, they can enter.

So, without increasing personnel, if free scenic spots no longer require QR code registration and can be entered with simple guidance, has the workload increased or decreased?

On this issue, I believe it should be viewed dialectically. In the past, requiring visitors to scan a QR code to register and then check in did complicate the process and increased the workload for staff. However, when entry is allowed simply by passing through the security check, it undeniably improves efficiency and is convenient and quick for visitors.

From the visitor's perspective, they gain convenience and speed, but what about the staff?

Firstly, staff may face unknown risks. Especially in cultural heritage sites, if the flow of people is too large and mixed, if some individuals damage cultural relics and then take the opportunity to escape, tracing responsibility becomes troublesome. At the very least, it increases the cost of tracing responsibility.

Secondly, staff will face challenges in controlling the flow of people. With the arrival of summer vacation and increased foot traffic, it is similar to how the subway needs to limit flow during peak hours. Therefore, for these free scenic spots, if the flow of people is extremely large, how to limit it will be a test.

For those who have already entered, they naturally have no objections, but for those who have not entered and wish to, they may feel they are being treated unfairly, which could lead to disputes and other negative incidents.

If disputes arise and staff lack the proper skills and choose to compromise by allowing people to enter, it could lead to a bandwagon effect, causing chaos on-site. If there is resistance, it clearly does not align with basic service quality, so effective communication skills will be a very important ability for staff.

Furthermore, if some people have made reservations while others have not, those who made reservations may feel disadvantaged if they do not receive preferential treatment. This is clearly not conducive to service transmission. Therefore, the best way to handle such changes is to notify the media about three days in advance, so there is a basis for reference, and the other party cannot complain. If there is no such action, once something bad happens, it may lead to mutual emotional confrontation.

Additionally, suggestions regarding the duration of stay are also crucial. Because some scenic spots are simply too small, if people linger for too long, it will hinder others from entering. If this leads to long waits, it will negatively impact the reputation of the scenic spot. Therefore, if the space is too small, reasonable visiting times should be suggested, or on-site guidance notifications should be provided, such as using a loudspeaker to announce.

In this non-real-name entry method, it may hinder the conduct of certain formal activities. The constant influx of people may cause confusion on-site, disrupting those formal activities.

Finally, this method tests the service capabilities and adaptability of staff. Appropriate service equipment should be provided for the elderly and children, ensuring that these vulnerable groups enjoy a safe environment.

Some scenic spots offer free guided tours, so after implementing the non-reservation free entry method, how should the guided services be allocated? This will greatly test the arrangement of guided services. Which groups should receive guided services? Which groups should not? It seems difficult to distinguish clearly. In this case, it might be better to set fixed times for guided services.

However, it is undeniable that some groups still require guided services, so completely switching to fixed guided services is also unrealistic. Therefore, for groups, the reservation capability should still be maintained, but upon arrival, they will not need to scan a code; they can simply pass through the security check. Only in this way can normal guided arrangements be maintained.

At the same time, the increasing number of visitors poses a huge test for the service capacity of scenic spots. For example, the capacity of restrooms; if the restrooms are too small and the demand for them is very high, it will cause congestion. Additionally, if the ventilation in the restrooms is poor, it may lead to unpleasant odors.

Of course, the demand for some convenient supplies will also increase, and related cleaning staff must pay attention to these constantly changing needs, while also being more diligent about the hygiene of the scenic spot than usual.

Due to the implementation of a no-registration method, there may also be a small probability of negative incidents occurring. For example, some individuals may be troublemakers and take the opportunity to blend in, which could increase the supervisory burden on staff, requiring them to patrol more frequently, resulting in a workload that may be greater than usual. This increased workload mainly involves supervising and guiding personnel.

Of course, adopting a free entry method also has its unique benefits.

Firstly, for visitors, they can experience a better quality of service and reduced sightseeing costs. Those who were previously afraid of the hassle will now enter the scenic spot without hesitation. In the past, they would leave immediately upon hearing that registration was required, but now they choose to enter. This increases the popularity of the scenic spot, allowing them to discover previously unknown sights and cultures.

Secondly, the focus of staff work shifts. Staff will be more involved in guiding, serving, and supervising. By eliminating factors that could lead to negative incidents, unnecessary troubles can be avoided. Since all kinds of people may appear at once, it is important to promptly address any negative feedback on-site to prevent further misunderstandings.

Furthermore, if visitors are carrying a lot of beverages, it may lead to crowded spaces where items are placed. In this case, effective differentiation methods should be implemented; otherwise, unnecessary disputes may arise.

This situation mainly targets relatively simple scenic spots. Many scenic spots already have free lockers, so this issue may not exist.

For items that are prohibited from entry, such as pets and lighters, it is essential to adhere to principles. Of course, not allowing pets is understandable, but lighters may pose some trouble, as some people might sneak them in. Therefore, signs prohibiting the carrying of lighters or smoking should be prominently displayed.

At the same time, for foreseeable risks, such as going up and down stairs, it is important to remind visitors to pay attention to safety and not to rush, which could lead to fractures or other related accidents.

In summary, free scenic spots adopting a no-registration method, while needing to protect many things inside the scenic area, means that quickly guiding visitors will be key to addressing this issue.