Yisha is an internet celebrity who often expresses personal opinions on popular social events. What impressed me the most was her stance on the Fat Cat incident and the Jiang Ping incident, especially her stance on the Jiang Ping incident. When social celebrities and elites were besieging a vocational student, Jiang Ping, with baseless speculations, Yisha stood by Jiang Ping, which made some so-called elite individuals very unhappy, leading them to hire internet trolls to smear this internet celebrity.

Previously, due to a certain incident, Phoenix News's excessive traffic-seeking behavior seemed to have been mocked by Yisha. Now, Phoenix News is also using the guise of national hatred to misrepresent this internet celebrity, claiming that her account was banned for inciting ethnic hatred. At first, I believed it, so I tried to search on WeChat Video Account, only to find that it was completely contrary to what Phoenix News reported. This further tarnished Phoenix News's credibility.

I am not unfamiliar with Phoenix News, but I do not have a good impression of it. It not only constantly engages in traffic-seeking behavior but also lacks integrity, even showing a rogue side in its own website management.

I remember when self-media first emerged, Phoenix News also joined in, but after its so-called Phoenix account was opened to the public, it found that certain accounts seemed to be gaining some traction and canceled those accounts without any notification or reason. I believe this behavior is a form of bullying. Regarding many incidents between China and foreign countries, Phoenix News often subtly leans towards foreign perspectives, bowing to capital forces and sacrificing its integrity for a few scraps. Therefore, I have almost stopped reading any news from Phoenix News; its website's values have always been problematic. Perhaps its essential characteristic is not patriotic.

Of course, aside from the above, it also lacks a broader perspective. Once it discovers someone speaking ill of it, it will think of various forms of retaliation, like an uncultured shrew, always remembering grievances. If it doesn't retaliate, it might just develop a gynecological disease.

The vast majority of Chinese netizens also have many complaints about Phoenix News, especially regarding its value stance on many incidents, with the comment section almost unanimously believing it to be quite animalistic. Of course, the above merely represents my viewpoint, based on long-term exposure to its content and cultural nuances.

As an unknown writer, my articles might be difficult for it to notice. I also find it hard to become a trending topic for it. Objectively speaking, the recent policies introduced by the country to curb extreme ethnic hatred are the right decision. However, Phoenix News does not use this to correctly interpret and educate others; instead, it attacks and smears a positive internet celebrity, which has a rather unwholesome characteristic.

Not long ago, a tragic incident occurred. An uncultured man attacked a Japanese mother and child, and a Chinese woman bravely stepped forward to protect them. Unfortunately, this hero died from severe injuries.

I believe that attacking unarmed Japanese mother and child does not count as bravery, and it is no different from the Japanese killing unarmed women and infants during their invasion of China. On the level of wrongdoing, their fundamental nature is the same.

As for the Chinese woman who stood up, I think she is very brave and deserves praise. She used her life to exemplify the goodness of resisting brutality.

However, I am not saying that we should indiscriminately consider all Japanese people as good. I simply do not condone the violent behavior of the man in this incident. China has suffered humiliation from great powers since modern times, especially from the brutal invasion by neighboring Japan, where many innocent Chinese people died at their hands, particularly during the Nanjing Massacre. Those civilians who laid down their arms or had lost their ability to resist became targets of slaughter, which is inhumane.

We understand the cruelty of war, which is why we cherish peace even more, and this requires mutual goodwill. If goodwill is only released unilaterally while the other side continues to commit evil, such peace cannot be maintained for long.

However, there are many media outlets online that often attack by taking things out of context and interpreting them extremely, inciting emotions among those who do not understand the truth. Nowadays, there are not many truly conscientious media outlets left; more often, there are two extreme interpretations that cater to traffic groups for capital gains.

Some self-media individuals and certain media often rely on creating attacks to boost their presence and gain traffic, thus achieving their goals at the expense of others. There are more and more cultural opportunists who have lost their basic values, speaking differently to different people, and although their souls are fragmented, when they see that the blood money they gain not only fills their stomachs but also allows them to live a life of luxury, morality and conscience have become trash they disdain.

Previously, when the domestic company Nongfu Spring faced a crisis, even Zhong Shanshan himself could not explain himself, and Phoenix News had written a very low-quality article in their official name. The piled-up words had no persuasive power, constantly emphasizing that others were attacking Nongfu Spring while ignoring the issues within Nongfu Spring itself. It’s like someone has a tumor on their face, and everyone says there’s a tumor, but Phoenix News jumps out and claims it must be someone deliberately attacking them. So when such articles come out, the comment section is almost 100% against it, truly shooting themselves in the foot, resulting in a loss. Perhaps their original intention was to seek traffic, but they wrote poorly and had no factual persuasive power, so when the heat passes, isn’t it a waste? Then they come out to disgust netizens again, and the result is that their presence is boosted, but there is no positive feedback.

Of course, there is no point in arguing with such cultural rogues. The reason I wrote this article today is based on a passion for justice. I hope there will be more sunshine and brightness online, more value stances based on the beauty of humanity, and fewer vulgar, shameless rogues.

China's fundamental stance has not changed, and the core values of socialism have not changed. Those unscrupulous self-media and media outlets attempting to confuse right and wrong by distorting and misinterpreting policies only reveal their ugly faces more clearly the louder they shout.

I believe that Yisha, as an internet celebrity, should not be indiscriminately attacked. We should distinguish between those who are positive and those who are controversial and disputed. Positive contributions should be recognized, while controversial ones should naturally be supervised by platforms. However, suddenly a clown appears, with few appealing fans, attempting to gain traffic by distorting and attacking others. What is the difference from an uneducated pet?

However, it is fortunate that the vast majority of netizens possess a positive value perspective. They may be easily misled before understanding the truth, but they will ultimately know the specific truth of the matter, leading to even greater hatred for those who create false truths. Although I am not a celebrity and my writings have very limited influence, speaking out for justice is still a very meaningful thing. I wish every reader who can read this article to have positive thoughts, be altruistic, and achieve their wishes.

Users who liked